Friday, 22nd November 2024 Puzzles Solved Yesterday: 114
Home | Register | Login | Current Puzzle | Archives | Leaderboard | Forum | Tutorial | FAQ

Forum Index   Weak analysis technique Tilps Kwon-Tom Obsessive Puzzles: 6720 Best Total: 18m 37s Posted - 2009.04.12 03:44:53 I was thinking a bit about edge pair restrictions, and I discovered that I had missed something they could do. (and as a result, my solver cannot take advantage of this...) In this puzzle, some advanced use of edge pair restrictions allows for static proof of two lines meeting at the 0, without a trial. However, this scenario seems hideously contrived, and I am wondering whether anyone uses this kind of analysis regularly during solving of puzzles? Jankonyex Kwon-Tom Obsessive Puzzles: 5680 Best Total: 9m 35s Posted - 2009.04.12 08:24:32 ¡Ï¡@¡Ï¡@¡Ï¡@¡Ï¡@¡Ï ¡@¢¯¡@¡@¡ý¡@¡@¢²¡@ ¡Ï¡@¡Ï¢é¡Ï¢ê¡Ï¡@¡Ï ¡@¡@¢ð¡@£A¡@¢ë¡@¡@ ¡Ï¡Ð¡Ï£A¡Ï£A¡Ï¡Ð¡Ï ¡@¡@¢ï¡@£A¡@¢ì¡@¡@ ¡Ï¡@¡Ï¢î¡Ï¢í¡Ï¡@¡Ï ¡@¢²¡@¡@¡ý¡@¡@¢²¡@ ¡Ï¡@¡Ï¡@¡Ï¡@¡Ï¡@¡Ï a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h=4 b+c<=1 d+e<=1 f+g<=1 therefore a+h>=1 replace 0 by 3 gives another example. I used this technique to due with the 3-2-...-2-3 pattern. Last edited by Jankonyex - 2009.04.12 08:26:45 Forum Index